August 03, (THEWILL) – The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has slammed internet celebrity, Mompha, following his allegation that the agency advised him to keep a low profile after the arrest of Hushpuppi.
THEWILL recalls that Mompha had alleged in an interview with controversial media personality, Daddy Freeze, that the “stubbornness” of Hushpuppi led to his downfall.
According to Mompha, after Hushpuppi’s arrest last year, he had deleted all pictures from his Instagram page but the EFCC “advised” him against doing such.
Reacting, in a statement on Monday, the EFCC denied the Instagram celebrity’s claim, saying the commission does not advise anyone suspected of crime.
It read: “The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, wishes to dissociate itself from claims by Ismaila Mustapha, alias Mompha, currently circulating in the social media, that he was advised by the Commission to maintain a low profile in the wake of the indictment of his friend, Abbas Ramon alias Hushpuppi in a $1.1m international fraud conspiracy by US Law enforcement.
“The claim which did not mention the official of the commission who supposedly gave the advice is spurious and should be discountenanced.
“The commission is not in the business of advising suspected internet fraudsters and it is far-fetched that it would counsel one against whom it has pending criminal charges in court.”
The anti-graft agency stated that Mompha and his company are still facing a 22-count charge the anti-graft agency filed against him.
It added: “Mompha and his company, Ismalob Global Investment Limited, are facing prosecution by the EFCC on a 22-count charge alleging various offences such as retention of proceeds of unlawful activities to wit; fraud.
“…failure to report transaction to the Commission as required by the provision of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act, 2011 (as amended), negotiating foreign exchange without license, contrary to Section 5 and 29 of the Foreign Exchange Monitoring and Miscellaneous (Provisions) Act, 2004;
“…engaging in foreign exchange transactions other than through the official foreign exchange market, contrary to provision of Section 11(1) (a) of the National Economic Intelligence Establishment Act to the tune of N32 billion before Justice A. M. Liman of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos.
“The Commission had called 10 witnesses and closed its case. But rather than enter his defense, Mompha filed a no-case submission which was overruled by the Court and called upon to open his defense.”
