Two angry letters later, the relationship between the Nigerian Army and   online newspaper, Premium Times has taken on some clarity. They have   both threatened to take legal actions against each other but the Army’s   letter, which came first is the one that gives one concerns.  Some   Nigerians would by now be ruing their earlier recriminations and taking   sides without the benefit of information.

The first layer of concerns is about what the military’s letter accused   the newspaper of. The second level of concerns derived from the   inability of the letter written in response by Premium Times to   sufficiently discharge it from the weighty accusations levelled against   it  by the army.

On a different facet is the dimension that the army has not made similar   accusations against any other publication even though it is on record   that several media organisations have reported, without jeopardising our   collective security, the shortcomings that they discovered in the way   the military conducts its affairs. This could only imply that the Army   detected something sinister in the way Premium Times has been reporting   its operation and has for some reason been mild in responding to this   obvious threat.

Ask ZiVA 728x90 Ads

The letter written by Major General I.M. Alkali  on behalf of the Chief   of Army Staff (COAS), Lt General Tukur Buratai is an eye opener. In that   communication more facts emerged as to why the Nigerian Army finally   decided to pursue legal actions against the online newspaper. It exposed   the newspaper’s interest in bringing down not just the army as an   institution but also Buratai as an individual.

It also revealed the Army’s frustration with what amounted to that   publication’s deliberate sabotage of the anti-terror war in manners that   have led to troops’ deaths on several occasions. It appeared the   decision to intimate Premium Times about a potential law suit was driven   by a desire to see the newspaper embrace professionalism like its other   contemporaries irrespective of its hidden agenda.

Several Nigerians have argued that openness with information is needed   for counterinsurgency operations to succeed. It is however important to   establish that some of those canvassing such openness merely parrot   lines from international gatherings without full appreciation of the   considerations involved. Few of those who demand disclosure of sensitive   operational information are aware that those who marketed these   standards to them do not themselves implement same in their own   countries.

One is therefore compelled to ask if the army could have approached the   issue in another way, like handing over every single byte of military   secrets to appease Premium Times. It does not appear this would have   achieved much with resoluteness one has seen on the part of its   aggressor, who is running the propaganda that the army is high handed.

But with the much one has seen of that organisation since Buratai took   charge it pursues the most conciliatory approach possible, which in this   case was mooting the prospect of dragging Premium Times before a court   perchance it will trigger a rethink. In exploring the legal option, the   army came off as not wanting to be  seen as stifling freedom of the   press even though the breaches committed by the online newspaper are   grievous.      That the newspaper rather resorted to writing a reply that only played   to the gallery is a testimony to its accuser’s claim that it not only   hates the leadership of the Nigerian Army and the Army as a service but   that it also hates Nigeria as a nation. This should set off alarm bells   for all patriotic Nigerians. We can survive the dangers of daily   onslaught on the existence of the country by foreign media networks but   the nation’s future existence would be counted in months if an indignous   media organisation staffed by Nigerians is on a hate campaign against   the country.

It therefore appears Nigerians do not realise that Premium Times  is   hiding under the guise of exclusive reports to put the lives of soldiers   on missions at risk on several occasions, with some even losing their   lives. If this had continued it was a matter of time before the   terrorists overran everywhere and kill off the rest of us. This will   explain the reservation expressed by the military leadership in the past   but which seemed to have only  spurred the people in the newspaper to do   more of such dangerous reporting.

The military is like a big family. The COAS must therefore tend to see   the troops as his family so one can imagine how painful it is for him,   which would be the case for other commanders, when people hide under   media to share information that lead to the death of troops.

It must be recalled that in the days when Boko Haram was running all   over the place, Premium Times was always the first to leak information   about troops movement. Some of those reports led to troops being   ambushed and each time that happened things ended badly. A cursory look   at other media, even the libertarian media of western countries do not   share information that could potentially endanger their militaries and   definitely not reporting troop movement prior to operations and platform   where terrorists have access to read.

Just like the army claimed, whatever grudge the online newspaper   harbours goes beyond the situation in the Gambia in a way that could   have endangered Nigerians living there. Premium Times’ story that the   Nigerian Army was planning to attack outgoing Gambian President (Yahya)   Jammeh was one that could have put the lives of Nigerians in Gambia at   risk for the mere fact that they would transform from peaceful regional   citizens to aggressors overnight.⁠⁠⁠⁠ There was also the   diplomatic aspect of how Nigeria now has to convince Gambians that it is   not invading their country. What were they trying to gain by making it   look like Nigerian Army was going to attack another country when it was   an ECOWAS decision?

Those loyal to Jammeh could have risen against helpless Nigerian   civilians living in the Gambia and they will lose their businesses and   even their lives. Premium Times would have then be able to repeat the   scenario where it hides under journalistic reporting to provide   information for Boko Haram terrorists to kill troops when its report   triggers the lynching of Nigerians in Gambia. Why it wants to earn this   unpleasant record of killing the most  Nigerians whether soldiers or   civilians and whether here at home or in far away Gambia remains a   mystery.

This is the kind of frustration that Premium Times  wants those securing   Nigeria to face on daily basis.

Written by Bukar Raheem.

THEWILL APP ADS 2