HURIWA

Human Rights Writers Association (HURIWA) appears to be redefining   itself in a manner that may soon necessitate a name change to reflect   the inherent distortions in its newfound direction. This group has   before now distinguished itself as one that rises to the occasion each   time the rights of Nigerians are being trampled upon, which would make   it sad if it leaves this noble pursuit for a narrower one defined by   parochial considerations.

HURIWA’s National Coordinator, Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko and the   National Media Affairs Director, Miss Zainab Yusuf issued a statement in   which it asked the Department of State Services (DSS) to “stop the   orchestrated profiling and persecution of the Nigerian Christian leaders   by its operatives.” The justification of that call was that the   Christian leaders were being hounded for seeking international donations   to re-build churches that have been destroyed in the northern parts of   the country.

There are however too many flawed premises in the call that HURIWA made   because contrary to its assertion that the DSS is prioritizing one   religion above the others, it is this group that has rather amplified   the right of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) above the other   shades and variation of beliefs in the country contrary to the   constitutionally guaranteed secularism in the country. HURIWA is   practically asking that some set of people, by virtue of being on the   executive of a religious association, should be granted the blank cheque   to engage in making dangerous utterances and seeking foreign incursions   into the country under the guise of raising funds to build destroyed   churches.

Ask ZiVA 728x90 Ads

The incentives for HURIWA’s umbrage are however glaring to see since   there is no iota of nationalism in its call to the DSS on the CAN   leadership nor has it shown any tendency for neutrality in recent   months, especially in the wake of the installation of the current   government. Much may be done to mask these incentives but the facts on   ground point to them in a way that mistakes cannot be made about them.

HURIWA has a history of being one of those cash and carry civil society   groups that pick briefs on selective basis just to deepen their pockets   and not on national interest. Oftentimes it is not just about the money   but it is about the highest bidder. It found a fitting alliance in the   segment of Christendom that has fallen to Mammon in the commitment to   make money by siding with evil ones that are bent of using religion to   burn Nigeria. It is a trend that is threatening to further spread and   permeate the fabrics of the church but must not be allowed to spread   further whether in the church or the civil society. As the fifth estate   of the realm, CSOs must focus more on the secular demand than   proselytizing even at the risk of being branded as not subscribing to   the existence of God.

Secondly, HURIWA would have to dispose of that sickening mentality of   viewing issues with the mind-set of an oppressed “southern” Nigeria.   It is well known that the name of the National Media Affairs Director,   Miss Zainab Yusuf, on statements and releases is meant to create a sense   of balance and national spread. But no one is fooled as to the fact that   HURIWA is all about Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko, a closet Biafra/IPOB   separatist, who does not believe in Nigeria as a nation. Had the   Director General of DSS been someone from the south east Onwubiko would   have rather been asking for financial settlement to look the other way   or would have simply seen nothing wrong with the CAN leaders being   questioned.   That the DG DSS is Muslim has not helped too since Onwubiko and his   HURIWA has a long history of low tolerance for certain faiths. This   explains the syndrome of perceiving himself as the modern day crusader   who rises to the defence of Christianity and must savage Muslims that   stand in the way.

Whichever of the identified factors is the driving force for HURIWA’s   latest outing, Onwubiko must bring himself to realize and accept that   making a category of persons above the law would be counterproductive.

The group has practically secured immunity for some politicians by   claiming they are being persecuted for being opposition whenever they   are to be tried for corruption. It must not create a new class of sacred   cows that will get away with just about any crime by claiming to be   persecuted Christian leaders. Nigeria should not get to a sorry stage   where any criminal at the risk of being investigated or prosecuted for   wrongdoing would hurriedly establish a church to disguise as a General   Overseer of a church in Nigeria and automatically get immunity.

There is also the fair presentation issue where a civil society   organization should be fair in its stated objective and mission. HURIWA   cannot label itself as a nationalistic group and be pursuing ethnic,   sectional and religious agenda. If it must do that it should rebrand,   including a name change, to reflect its new business model.

Written by Okanga Agila.

THEWILL APP ADS 2