August 06, (THEWILL) — The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, has set aside a Federal High Court ruling that struck out an interim forfeiture order obtained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to seize 14 properties allegedly linked to Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello.
In a unanimous judgement delivered virtually on Wednesday, a three-member panel of Justices, including Yargata Nimpar, Danlami Senchi and Paul Bassi, held that the lower court erred in law by relying on Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution to strike out the case, instead of determining whether the properties should be permanently forfeited.
In the lead judgement, Justice Nimpar held that immunity does not extend to properties suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activity, and such assets can be investigated and preserved pending the outcome of a forfeiture application.
“The trial court erred in striking out the case rather than proceeding to determine whether the properties should be finally forfeited”, the court ruled.
The Appellate court also dismissed Bello’s preliminary objection as lacking merit, reinstated the interim forfeiture order, and directed the EFCC to proceed with the final forfeiture hearing.
The Federal High Court in Lagos, presided over by Justice Nicholas Oweibo, had granted an interim forfeiture order in favour of the EFCC. Obtained via an ex parte application, the order allowed the anti-graft agency to temporarily seize 14 properties located in Lagos, Abuja, and Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE), suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activity. It also directed the EFCC to publish the order in two national newspapers, inviting interested parties to show cause why the properties should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.
Following the publication, Governor Bello filed a notice of intention to oppose the forfeiture and applied to vacate the interim order.
Mr Bello’s counsel, Abdulwahab Mohammed SAN, had argued that the properties were acquired before he was elected governor and therefore could not have been purchased with Kogi State funds. He invoked Section 308 of the Constitution, which grants immunity to sitting governors from civil and criminal proceedings, contending that the EFCC lacked the authority to institute any action against him while in office.
Mohammed argued that the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2022, could not be applied retroactively, as the properties were allegedly acquired before the law came into effect. He further argued that the Federal High Court in Lagos lacked jurisdiction, as the properties were located in Abuja, Kogi, and Dubai, and he resides in Lokoja.
In response, EFCC counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), urged the court to uphold the interim forfeiture order, arguing that no Nigerian court had barred the commission from carrying out its constitutional duties. He maintained that the properties, including a luxury apartment at the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, were reasonably suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activity. He also sought the forfeiture of an additional N400 million linked to the same investigation.
Justice Oweibo, however, ruled in Mr Bello’s favour, holding that Section 308 of the Constitution shielded a sitting governor from any form of civil or criminal proceedings.
The judge held that the court lacked jurisdiction and struck out the case.
Dissatisfied with the decision, the EFCC approached the appellate court, seeking to restore the interim forfeiture order.
In a unanimous judgement on Wednesday, the appellate court reinstated the interim forfeiture order and directed the anti-graft agency to proceed with the final forfeiture hearing.
Felix Ifijeh is a journalist with years of professional reporting experience. Known for his keen news sense, compelling storytelling and commitment to accurate, impactful reporting, he has built a reputation for turning leads into clear, engaging, and well-structured reports that resonate with readers. His work reflects deep newsroom experience and a commitment to accurate, impactful journalism.
