OPINION: POLITICS OF ‘AIRSTRIKES’ 

Must Read

Airstrikes, the pounding of the ground by powerful bombs raining from  the skies, is on-going  in three countries of the Middle East. Although  the targets and victims including armed and unarmed persons, the strong  and the weak, children and the elderly, women and children, schools and  hospitals,  are the same, they elicit different reactions.

This depends  on who is dropping the bombs, which side is doing the killing, who is  doing the dying and  who benefits economically or politically.  In this week’s battle  to retake Mosul in Iraq from the Islamic State  (ISIS) forces, the airstrikes were  by  the American-led coalition.

The  airstrikes gave   support to the Iraqi Army, the Kurdish (Peshmerga)  Christian and  Sunni  militias.

Ask ZiVA 728x90 Ads

The British Army involved in the Mosul  attack could  be identified in  their white bullet proof 4×4 vehicles;  American soldiers involved were  ensconced in their  mine resistant  ambush-protected vehicles (MRAP) The aim is to defeat ISIS.

Interestingly, no air support was given to the Shia militia which is  also fighting the terrorists to retake Mosul. It is part of the politics  being played by the West; the Shiites can fight and die, but the Sunnis  must be protected.

In the first seventeen days of October, there were seventy airstrikes  against Mosul, or an average of four daily. This was to soften the city  for the follow-up invasion. In these relentless airstrikes on the city,  little or nothing was said about the 1.5 million civilians  including  over 600,00 children trapped. In the October battles, 869 civilians were  killed. No  safe routes were provided for the civil populace and no talk  of a humanitarian corridor.

I guess they were regarded as collateral  damage. The  ‘protection’ the Iraqi Army offered the  civilian  populace was that they should hang white flags in their homes to  indicate they are non-combatant. But this is not a smart advise as it  would have made  such homes and families vulnerable to ISIS attacks.  Aleppo which was Syria’s most populous city with over 2.3 million  people was attacked in 2012 with large parts of the city still in rebel  hands. At least a dozen rebel groups, mainly terrorist like ISIS,  al-Nusra and al-Qaeda took part in the occupation of Aleppo.

Other rebel  groups involved in the fighting include Fatah Halab,  Jabha Fateh,  al-Sham. Many of the rebels are supported and funded  by Qatar, Saudi  Arabia, Turkey, US and France.

On the Syrian side is Russia which carries out the airstrikes. Like  Mosul, tragically, there have been civilian casualties, and non-military  places have been bombed. In October, with the assistance of Russian  airstrikes,  the Syrian Army  retook from ISIS, six villages in Aleppo;  Mahatah, Tall Susin, Tall Sha’ir, Fafin, Babinnis and Kafr Qaris.

While there were no offers of peaceful evacuation of civilians in Mosul,  the Syrian President,  Bashar al- Assad on October 6,  offered rebel  groups amnesty and an offer for evacuation of civilians.  WHILE THE ‘INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY’ TOLERATES AIRSTRIKES AGAINST  CIVILIAN AREAS IN MOSUL,  IT HAS SEVERELY ATTACKED  RUSSIA FOR CARRYING  OUT MOSUL-LIKE AIRSTRIKES  IN ALEPPO. French President Francois Hollande  described the Russian airstrikes as “a war crime” He and German  Chancellor Angela Merkel  have decided to mobilize European Union  sanctions against Russia for the airstrikes.

United Kingdom Foreign  Minister, Boris Johnson said the Russian airstrikes are a gross crime  against humanity. The UK and US are partnering on  economic sanctions  against Russia.

There are also talks of  expelling  Russia from the UN  Human Rights Council. A major voice of  dissent came  from Italian  Foreign Minister, Paolo Gentiloni who cautioned against the orchestrated  drama against Russia.

An intriguing side of the Syrian issue is that  while the West and Turkey cry about the Russian  airstrikes, they do not  want to end the war unless the Syrian government capitulates.

Perhaps a more intriguing case is  the quite bloody airstrikes in Yemen  by Saudi Arabia,  Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Morocco,  Jordan and Egypt,  which has now withdrawn from the carnage. These countries with  mercenaries decided to intervene in 2015 on the side of  the defeated  government of  President Abdrabbuh Mansur Haddin Aden by bombing Yemen  under ‘Operation Decisive Storm’.

Those on the receiving end of the  airstrikes are the Houthis who led the rebellion against Aden, the  Yemeni Army loyal to former President Ali Abdullah Saleh, the Yemeni  Republican   Guard, the Popular Committees and the Yemeni Air Force.  Of  course, the major casualties are civilians who are deliberately  targeted. The UN says the Saudi-led attacks have resulted in 3,799  civilian deaths. Whole towns and villages had been carpet-bombed. The  most infamous of the Saudi airstrikes  was last October when a huge  funeral  was deliberately targeted with 155 murdered and 525 injured.

There were of course no worldwide condemnation of this heinous crime,  nor was it described by the leading nations as a war crime. The muffled  voice of American Secretary of  State, John Kerry merely asked Saudi  Arabia  to give assurances that it would no longer pick targets like  funerals. No organization has dragged the Saudi coalition to the UN for  these inhuman airstrikes and the blockade of Yemen to starve its  population to submission. Nor has any taken the US and United Kingdom  before any UN body for providing logistical support including aerial  refueling and technical aid in the Yemeni airstrikes.  In all these, I am not condoning the retaliatory rocket and mortar  attacks on Saudi border towns.

The first known airstrike was on November 1, 1911 when four bombs were  dropped on Turkish-held oasis in Libya by Italian Second Lieutenant  Guilio Gavotti. Some of the most infamous were the German and Italian  airstrikes in Madrib, Valencia and Barcelonia in support of General  Francisco Franco’s fascist coup against the legitimate Spanish  Republican Government. As part of this, the Spanish city of  Guernica  was on April 26, 1937 almost wiped out.

Of course the  August 6, 1945 American dropping of the uranium atomic  bomb, ‘Little Boy’ on Hiroshima which killed 150,000 persons and the  plutonium bomb ‘Fat Man’ on Nagasaki three days later with 75,000  killed, hold the trophy for the most infamous airstrikes in human  history.  As a journalist, I cannot forget the April 23, 1999 America precision  bombing  of the Serbian State  Broadcasting Station headquarters with  150 media workers on duty. Ten were killed, 18 injured and 20 buried  under the rubble.

The North Atlantic  Treaty Organisation (NATO)  Military Spokesman, Air Commodore David Wilby, had justified the bombing   as a “legitimate target (because the station)  filled the airways  with hate and with lies over the years”  Then British Prime Minister,  Tony Blair said the airstrikes against the Serbian media were  “entirely justified” because they were “part of the apparatus of  dictatorship”  So you can get away with mass murder through airstrikes if your politics  is right.

Written by Owei Lakemfa.

THEWILL APP ADS 2
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
Latest News

UEFA Refuses To End FIFA World Cup Boycott Despite Infantino’s U-Turn

UEFA has confirmed it will continue its boycott of FIFA's men's and women's World Cups despite Gianni Infantino...
- Advertisement -spot_img

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -spot_img